Tonight on Gadfly Radio w/ Martha Montelongo & CalWatchDog’s John Seiler, CA City Journal’s Ben Boychuk & Special Guest, Marcia Fritz CPA, President of Californians 4 Fiscal Responsibility.

Gadfly Radio Tonight, at 8 PM PT

Live Call in number: 1-818-602-4929 
September 13, 2011 Tonight live at 8PM PT:  Tonight on Gadfly Radio, Ben Boychuk of CA City Journal joins me as we talk with John Seiler of, with special guest Marcia Fritz CPA, President of California Foundation for Fiscal Responsibility.

Yesterday Flashreport published an op-ed called REFORM PUBLIC PENSIONS OR PERISH, co-authored by Carl DeMaio, San Diego City Councilman and Jon Coupal, President, Howard Jarvis Taxpayers Association.

Today, John Seiler posted a follow up piece in what appears to be a back and forth rally between he and CalPERS, titled CalPERS Misleads Members on 20.7% Gain.

On Sept. 1, I wrote an article on, “CalPERS Still Boasting of 20.7 Percent Gain,” which was what they made from July 1, 2010 to June 30, 2011. In the subsequent two months, the fund had dropped 4.4 percent. Yet, as I reported, CalPERS still was boasting of the 20.7 percent in the fall number of PERSpective, the newsletter mailed to its members in late August.

Some members must have griped to CalPERS because, on Sept. 12, it responded to me, by name, on its CalPERS Responds Web site. There’s no link to my original article, so members can’t easily check for themselves what I actually said.

We’ll talk about the issue, the spin from CalPERS, and the dire straights of California’s economy tonight on Gadfly Radio.

Today I had an exchange with a very nice man who is  offended by this ‘tirade’ by angry taxpayers to reform what the voters approved in terms of Public Employee Pensions and benefits.  We’ll definitely discuss this point with Marcia Fritz, John Seiler and Ben Boychuk tonight.

Should taxpayers bleed their jobs, assets, disposable income, city services  and more for the sake of being held to fulfill on promises we agreed to, even if we didn’t know what the formulas amounted to, or didn’t understand what they meant in terms of size of retirement incomes?    He thinks yes.  This is the battleline.  I’m for hugging our adversary and saying we’re all in this together.  What is unsustainable is unsustainable and there are consequences for not addressing destructive policy.  For the sake of a healthy economy and communities, we have to reform. 

Ben Boychuk is reporting live with Parent Revolution’s First-of-its-Kind Parent Power Express Bus Tour in Los Angeles TODAY!

We’ll take your calls, questions and comments on the air at 1-818-602-4929.

I am a stand for liberty, freedom and prosperity for all people; a stand for vibrant and innovative small businesses that create jobs, that in the process of prospering, nurture and support creative and dynamic culture, in the work place, and in our personal lives.

Thank you for supporting our program, by listening, sponsoring, and or sharing this post with others.

It’s a pleasure to share this program with
team of government policy watch dogs and the great investigative work they produce!

Tuesday nights live, on Gadfly Radio in Southern California or where ever you are. California, the land of beauty and unlimited possibility because of the abundance of our greatest capital resource, our human resources, when we get it right. Join us.

Or you can listen to a podcast later, if you miss the live call-in show by clicking on the white player to stream or the orange player to download and or subscribe to Gadfly on iTunes:


Public Asked to Help Reform Pensions in CA by The CA Foundation for Fiscal Reform

By Marcia Fritz

President of the California Foundation for Fiscal Responsibility
Thu, January 6th, 2011

The California Foundation for Fiscal Responsibility posted two alternative public pension reform plans on our Web site, and we are inviting stakeholders and the public to help solve one of the most critical problems facing California.
Our lawmakers can’t fix California’s public pension crisis without the public’s help, and it’s got to be done right the first time. If it becomes necessary to put a constitutional amendment before voters, it should be drafted with input from stakeholders, experts and voters. offers a forum to anyone with information or opinions that can contribute to a healthy debate.
Click here to read more.

Bookmark and Share